Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine ; (36): 221-225, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-931150

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the application value of evaluation and management of patients with acute chest pain in China (EMPACT) score in risk stratification for patients with acute chest pain.Methods:According to the methods of prospective cohort study, 548 patients with chest pain in the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from February to April 2021 were selected. The risk stratification was performed according to EMPACT score. The primary endpoint was the major adverse events (MAE) within 30 d, including death from all causes, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), emergency revascularization, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock and other life-threatening situations that need urgent attention. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of EMPACT score for MAE.Results:Among the 548 patients, 75 cases had MAE within 30 d (MAE group), and the incidence of MAE was 13.7%; 473 cases did not occur MAE (non-MAE group). The EMPACT score in MAE group was significantly higher than that in non-MAE group: 8 (12, 18) scores vs. 5 (2, 8) scores, and there was statistical difference ( Z = 8.94, P<0.01). Spearman correlation analysis result showed that EMPACT score was positively correlated with MAE ( r = 0.38, P<0.01). ROC curve analysis result showed that the area under the curve of EMPACT score in prediction within 30 d MAE was 0.820 (95% CI 0.770 to 0.871), the cut-off value was 9.5 scores (since all the scoring systems were integers, the cut-off value was 10 scores), the sensitivity was 88.6%, and the specificity was 60.0%. Conclusions:The EMPACT score has a good risk stratification capability to achieve safe and effective triage of acute chest pain.

2.
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners ; (6): 649-655, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-957886

ABSTRACT

Objective:To assess the application of three risk stratification scoring systems in evaluation and management of patients with acute chest pain.Methods:Patients with chest pain who visited the emergency department of Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from February 2021 to April 2021 were recruited. The risk stratification evaluation was performed with EMPACT, HEART-Pathway and EDACS-ADP scoring systems. The primary endpoint was the major adverse events (MAE) within 30 days.The application values of three scales in identifying high-risk chest pain were evaluated.Results:A total of 628 patients with acute chest pain were enrolled, and 92 of them(14.95%) had MAE within 30 days. The scores of three scales were all positively correlated with MAE occurrence, while the EMPACT score had the highest correlation( r=0.41, P<0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of EMPACT score, HEART score and EDACS for predicting MAE within 30 days was 0.834(95% CI:0.790-0.878), 0.763(95% CI:0.710-0.817) and 0.635(95% CI:0.578-0.691), respectively. When the cut-off value was 9.5, the Yorden index of EMPACT score was the highest (0.561). Since all the scoring systems used integers, the EMPACT score of 10 was the threshold to distinguish low-risk chest pain from high-risk chest pain. The sensitivity of EMPACT, HEART-Pathway and EDACS-ADP scores in identifying high-risk chest pain patients was 0.707, 0.576 and 0.783, and the specificity of them was 0.854, 0.882 and 0.509, respectively. Conclusion:The EMPACT score has a good risk stratification ability, and it can be used for identifying patients with acute chest pain.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL